The lead story in Socialist Lurker was "Scientists admit climate reports wrong: It's actually far far worse." I may get round to posting it here at PED, who knows. The point of my rambling is that the story pointed out that there was a discernible pattern of scientists recanting their previous predictions of the speed and scope of climate change's impacts of food production, glacier melt, ocean acidification, forest die-back etc etc. Science is too small-c conservative on this particular wicked post-normal science problem
The drumbeat of bad news gets louder and louder, with the latest example being, Dr Chris Field, a co-ordinating editor of the previous IPCC report (which got a roasting for its caution), telling a meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science that - you guessed it- the carbon dioxide emissio
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/35585/35585a78ab9fc2965131c23a45f1ce00cf951a87" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6b4ba/6b4ba520c9ac8f4cd388ac2067442440c113196c" alt=""
No comments:
Post a Comment